Check out the Oscars live on your local ABC affiliate at 8pm EST/5pm PST on March 25, 2001.




'Parents' is excruciatingly hilarious

By Matt Soergel
Florida Times-Union

Meet the Parents is the funniest movie I've seen in my six-and-a-half blissful years of reviewing movies.

No doubt about it.

In fact, it may be the funniest movie since A Fish Called Wanda, made 12 years ago.

After a slowish start, it quickly revs up and becomes sharply, excruciatingly funny, without relying on gross-out humor or outlandish jokes that come from nowhere.

Instead it specializes in the agonizingly comic things people do to themselves when they get in trouble by refusing to admit they were wrong.

And so a bad situation only gets worse. And worse.

Meet the Parents has a killer comic premise: A youngish, confident, urbane and urban Jewish man is suddenly transplanted to the leafy, WASP suburbs -- home to his prospective father-in-law.

That would be Robert De Niro, in all his coiled menace.

Yikes.

And the prospective son-in-law (Ben Stiller, flawless as usual) is rendered helpless with nervousness, with a foot permanently lodged in his mouth.

Under the withering eyes of De Niro, everything Stiller says and does comes out all wrong. Starting with his name: It's Greg Focker . . . and yes, it's spelled just like it sounds.

De Niro is Jack Byrnes, a humorless dad who believes no man is good enough for his daughter, Pam (Felicity's Teri Polo). Bad enough. But soon

Byrnes' cover story slips: He's not a retired horticulturist.

He's an expert in interrogation. For the CIA. And he has lots of questions for the man who would think he's good enough to marry his daughter.

But Meet the Parents is far from a one-joke movie: There's much more going on here, most of it revolving around the subtle emasculation of Focker.

He has that unfortunate last name. The airlines have lost his luggage, so he has to wear other people's clothes. He's a renter, not a homeowner. He doesn't have a portfolio. His rental car's not up to snuff.

And he's a nurse.

"Not many men in your profession, are there Greg?" De Niro says, with exquisite comic timing.

De Niro is hilarious, far funnier and more restrained than he was in Analyze This: His character may be a stretch, but not by much. Blythe Danner, as his barely under control wife, works some frazzled magic: Watch her carefully.

Then there's another priceless turn by Owen Wilson (Shanghai Noon), who plays Pam's ex-boyfriend. He's impossibly rich. He's handsome. He works with wood. And he's a nice guy, too. Why'd Pam ever let him go?

Director Jay Roach, fresh off the Austin Powers movies, shows a knack for a deadpan humor, giving his cast plenty of room, allowing the agonizing comic situations to fester wonderfully.

He even manages to pull off the inevitable happy ending we demand of a movie like this, even as the situation gets more and more nightmarish, more and more irretrievably botched.

I was sitting there wondering how they were going to pull this ending off. Would it be unforgivably sappy? Would it spoil what came before it?

Here's the happy, simple answer: No. Not at all.



ACADEMY AWARDS, OSCAR(S), OSCAR NIGHT, and the OSCAR statuette are the copyrighted property of the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences. This site is neither endorsed by nor affiliated with the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.

Copyright © 2001, Morris Digital Works, Morris Communications Corporation






"Crowe was not being rewarded for his performance in Gladiator, but rather his LAC, Insider, and Gladiator put together. Tom Hanks is going to win the oscar next year for Road to Perdition, Sam Mendez is no fluke. If you wanna whine about something winning that didn't deserve it, complain about Gladiator for best picture. Traffic wins oscars for directing, screenplay,and editing, not to mention del toro's for supporting actor and the SAG award for best ensemble. Why vote for Gladiator over Traffic when it wins the other awards? "

--Anonymous